You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-236 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anke Rohwer, Anel Schoonees, Taryn Young |
| Abstract |
This paper describes the process, our experience and the lessons learnt in doing document reviews of health science curricula. Since we could not find relevant literature to guide us on how to approach these reviews, we feel that sharing our experience would benefit researchers embarking on similar projects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 63% |
| Congo | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,652,833
of 23,545,680 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#864
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,479
of 263,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,545,680 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.