↓ Skip to main content

Genotype-phenotype correlations in recessive RYR1-related myopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype-phenotype correlations in recessive RYR1-related myopathies
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Amburgey, Angela Bailey, Jean H Hwang, Mark A Tarnopolsky, Carsten G Bonnemann, Livija Medne, Katherine D Mathews, James Collins, Jasper R Daube, Gregory P Wellman, Brian Callaghan, Nigel F Clarke, James J Dowling

Abstract

RYR1 mutations are typically associated with core myopathies and are the most common overall cause of congenital myopathy. Dominant mutations are most often associated with central core disease and malignant hyperthermia, and genotype-phenotype patterns have emerged from the study of these mutations that have contributed to the understanding of disease pathogenesis. The recent availability of genetic testing for the entire RYR1 coding sequence has led to a dramatic expansion in the identification of recessive mutations in core myopathies and other congenital myopathies. To date, no clear patterns have been identified in these recessive mutations, though no systematic examination has yet been performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 16%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,382,900
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,130
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,794
of 197,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#34
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.