↓ Skip to main content

Implementing comprehensive prevention of mother-to-child transmission and HIV prevention for South African couples: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing comprehensive prevention of mother-to-child transmission and HIV prevention for South African couples: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Jones, Karl Peltzer, Stephen M Weiss, Sibusiso Sifunda, Ntabozuko Dwane, Shandir Ramlagan, Ryan Cook, Gladys Matseke, Vincent Maduna, Andrew Spence

Abstract

In rural South Africa, only two-thirds of HIV-positive pregnant women seeking antenatal care at community health centers took full advantage of 'prevention of mother-to-child transmission' (PMTCT) services in 2010. Studies generally support male involvement to promote PMTCT, but the nature and impact of that involvement is unclear and untested. Additionally, stigma, disclosure and intimate partner violence pose significant barriers to PMTCT uptake and retention in care, suggesting that male involvement may be 'necessary, but not sufficient' to reduce infant HIV incidence. This study expands on a successful United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported PMTCT couples intervention pilot study conducted in the Mpumalanga province, targeting HIV-positive pregnant women and their partners, the primary objective being to determine whether male partner involvement plus a behavioral intervention will significantly reduce infant HIV incidence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 347 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 17%
Researcher 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 100 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 15%
Psychology 37 11%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 110 32%