↓ Skip to main content

Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-14-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehmet Aksoy, Aysenur Dostbil, Ilker Ince, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Hacı Ahmet Alici, Ali Aydin, Osman Ozgur Kilinc

Abstract

Our aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,544,756
of 8,702,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#397
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,066
of 205,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,702,492 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.