↓ Skip to main content

A MATLAB tool for pathway enrichment using a topology-based pathway regulation score

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A MATLAB tool for pathway enrichment using a topology-based pathway regulation score
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0358-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maysson Ibrahim, Sabah Jassim, Michael Anthony Cawthorne, Kenneth Langlands

Abstract

BackgroundHandling the vast amount of gene expression data generated by genome-wide transcriptional profiling techniques is a challenging task, demanding an informed combination of pre-processing, filtering and analysis methods if meaningful biological conclusions are to be drawn. For example, a range of traditional statistical and computational pathway analysis approaches have been used to identify over-represented processes in microarray data derived from various disease states. However, most of these approaches tend not to exploit the full spectrum of gene expression data, or the various relationships and dependencies. Previously, we described a pathway enrichment analysis tool created in MATLAB that yields a Pathway Regulation Score (PRS) by considering signalling pathway topology, and the overrepresentation and magnitude of differentially-expressed genes (J Comput Biol 19:563¿573, 2012). Herein, we extended this approach to include metabolic pathways, and described the use of a graphical user interface (GUI).ResultsUsing input from a variety of microarray platforms and species, users are able to calculate PRS scores, along with a corresponding z-score for comparison. Further pathway significance assessment may be performed to increase confidence in the pathways obtained, and users can view Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway diagrams marked-up to highlight impacted genes.ConclusionsThe PRS tool provides a filter in the isolation of biologically-relevant insights from complex transcriptomic data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 59 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 30%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Computer Science 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Chemistry 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,931,785
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,825
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,339
of 264,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#81
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.