You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
To what extent are the wishes of a signatory reflected in their advance directive: a qualitative analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-52 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Friedemann Nauck, Matthias Becker, Claudius King, Lukas Radbruch, Raymond Voltz, Birgit Jaspers |
Abstract |
Advance directives (ADs) are assumed to reflect the patients' preferences, even if these are not clearly expressed. Research into whether this assumption is correct has been lacking. This study explores to what extent ADs reflect the true wishes of the signatories. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 23% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 22% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#945
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,478
of 226,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.