↓ Skip to main content

Analysis and prediction of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA binding proteins based on protein sequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis and prediction of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA binding proteins based on protein sequences
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1715-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Wang, Lin Sun, Shiguang Zhang, Hongjun Zhang, Jinling Shi, Tianhe Xu, Keliang Li

Abstract

DNA-binding proteins perform important functions in a great number of biological activities. DNA-binding proteins can interact with ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) or dsDNA (double-stranded DNA), and DNA-binding proteins can be categorized as single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) and double-stranded DNA-binding proteins (DSBs). The identification of DNA-binding proteins from amino acid sequences can help to annotate protein functions and understand the binding specificity. In this study, we systematically consider a variety of schemes to represent protein sequences: OAAC (overall amino acid composition) features, dipeptide compositions, PSSM (position-specific scoring matrix profiles) and split amino acid composition (SAA), and then we adopt SVM (support vector machine) and RF (random forest) classification model to distinguish SSBs from DSBs. Our results suggest that some sequence features can significantly differentiate DSBs and SSBs. Evaluated by 10 fold cross-validation on the benchmark datasets, our prediction method can achieve the accuracy of 88.7% and AUC (area under the curve) of 0.919. Moreover, our method has good performance in independent testing. Using various sequence-derived features, a novel method is proposed to distinguish DSBs and SSBs accurately. The method also explores novel features, which could be helpful to discover the binding specificity of DNA-binding proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,991
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,889
of 7,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,114
of 317,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#110
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.