↓ Skip to main content

Avoiding perceived past resource use of potential competitors affects niche dynamics in a bird community

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avoiding perceived past resource use of potential competitors affects niche dynamics in a bird community
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12862-014-0175-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jukka T Forsman, Sami M Kivelä, Tuomo Jaakkonen, Janne-Tuomas Seppänen, Lars Gustafsson, Blandine Doligez

Abstract

Social information use is usually considered to lead to ecological convergence among involved con- or heterospecific individuals. However, recent results demonstrate that observers can also actively avoid behaving as those individuals being observed, leading to ecological divergence. This phenomenon has been little explored so far, yet it can have significant impact on resource use, realized niches and species co-existence. In particular, the time-scale and the ecological context over which such shifts can occur are unknown. We examined with a long-term (four years) field experiment whether experimentally manipulated, species-specific, nest-site feature preferences (symbols on nest boxes) are transmitted across breeding seasons and affect future nest-site preferences in a guild of three cavity-nesting birds.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 52%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%