↓ Skip to main content

Impact of gender on the decision to participate in a clinical trial: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of gender on the decision to participate in a clinical trial: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Lobato, Jeffrey Michael Bethony, Fernanda Bicalho Pereira, Shannon Lee Grahek, David Diemert, Maria Flávia Gazzinelli

Abstract

In order for Informed Consent to be ethical and valid each clinical trial participant must be able to make a voluntary decision to participate, free from pressure or coercion. Nonetheless, many factors may influence the decision reached, and such influences may be different for male and female volunteers. Being aware of these differences may help researches develop better processes for obtaining consent that safeguard the right of autonomy for all participants. The goal of this study was to evaluate potential gender-based differences in the factors influencing clinical trial participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 18%
Psychology 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,224,854
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,821
of 16,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,216
of 270,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#139
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.