You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Type-1 pericytes accumulate after tissue injury and produce collagen in an organ-dependent manner
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt512 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Birbrair, Tan Zhang, Daniel Clark Files, Sandeep Mannava, Thomas Smith, Zhong-Min Wang, Maria Laura Messi, Akiva Mintz, Osvaldo Delbono |
| Abstract |
Fibrosis, or scar formation, is a pathological condition characterized by excessive production and accumulation of collagen, loss of tissue architecture, and organ failure in response to uncontrolled wound healing. Several cellular populations have been implicated, including bone marrow-derived circulating fibrocytes, endothelial cells, resident fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and recently, perivascular cells called pericytes. We previously demonstrated pericyte functional heterogeneity in skeletal muscle. Whether pericyte subtypes are present in other tissues and whether a specific pericyte subset contributes to organ fibrosis are unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 19% |
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 7% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,308,455
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#423
of 2,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,031
of 277,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.