The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Success rates with nicotine personal vaporizers: a prospective 6-month pilot study of smokers not intending to quit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1159 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Polosa, Pasquale Caponnetto, Marilena Maglia, Jaymin B Morjaria, Cristina Russo |
| Abstract |
Electronic cigarettes (e-Cigs) are an attractive long-term alternative nicotine source to conventional cigarettes. Although they may assist smokers to remain abstinent during their quit attempt, studies using first generation e-Cigs report low success rates. Second generation devices (personal vaporisers - PVs) may result in much higher quit rates, but their efficacy and safety in smoking cessation and/or reduction in clinical trials is unreported. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#810,299
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#851
of 17,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,839
of 277,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.