You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of a physical exercise training programme COPD in primary care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-788 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annemieke Fastenau, Jean WM Muris, Rob A de Bie, Erik JM Hendriks, Guus M Asijee, Emmylou Beekman, Rik Gosselink, Onno CP van Schayck |
| Abstract |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is recognized as a systemic illness with significant extra-pulmonary features, such as exercise intolerance and muscle weakness. Pulmonary rehabilitation has been shown to be very effective in counteracting these consequences in patients with more advanced COPD. However, limited data is available on the efficacy of a physical exercise training programme in patients with mild to moderate COPD in primary care. Furthermore, it is unknown if improved exercise capacity translates into enhanced daily physical activities. The aim of this paper is to describe the design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a physical exercise training programme in patients with mild to moderate COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 100 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,382,900
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,834
of 14,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,093
of 229,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#245
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.