Title |
How we read pediatric PET/CT: indications and strategies for image acquisition, interpretation and reporting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Imaging, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40644-017-0130-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabrielle C. Colleran, Neha Kwatra, Leah Oberg, Frederick D. Grant, Laura Drubach, Michael J. Callahan, Robert D. MacDougall, Frederic H. Fahey, Stephan D. Voss |
Abstract |
PET/CT plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging and management of many pediatric malignancies. The techniques for performing PET/CT examinations in children have evolved, with increasing attention focused on reducing patient exposure to ionizing radiation dose whenever possible and minimizing scan duration and sedation times, with a goal toward optimizing the overall patient experience. This review outlines our approach to performing PET/CT, including a discussion of the indications for a PET/CT exam, approaches for optimizing the exam protocol, and a review of different approaches for acquiring the CT portion of the PET/CT exam. Strategies for PACS integration, image display, interpretation and reporting are also provided. Most practices will develop a strategy for performing PET/CT that best meets their respective needs. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview for radiologists who are new to pediatric PET/CT, and also to provide experienced PET/CT practitioners with an update on state-of-the art CT techniques that we have incorporated into our protocols and that have enabled us to make considerable improvements to our PET/CT practice. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Norway | 1 | 17% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |