↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA-21 and the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNA-21 and the clinical outcomes of various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjia Wang, Jinhui Li, Wei Zhu, Chen Gao, RuiJingfang Jiang, Wenxue Li, Qiansheng Hu, Bo Zhang

Abstract

MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) has been suggested to play a significant role in the prognosis of carcinoma. The recognition of novel biomarkers for the prediction of cancer outcomes is urgently required. However, the potential prognostic value of miR-21 in various types of human malignancy remains controversial. The present meta-analysis summarises and analyses the associations between miR-21 status and overall survival (OS) in a variety of tumours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,731,162
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,956
of 8,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,336
of 262,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#131
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.