↓ Skip to main content

Malariometric indices from Iganga, Uganda: baseline characterization in preparation of GMZ2 vaccine trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malariometric indices from Iganga, Uganda: baseline characterization in preparation of GMZ2 vaccine trial
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Kaddumukasa, William Buwembo, Musa Sekikubo, Halima Naiwumbwe, Fatuma Namusoke, Stephen Kiwuwa, Brenda Oketch, Ramadhani Noor, Roma Chilengi, Edison Mworozi, Fred Kironde

Abstract

Malaria still remains the leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in Uganda. Interventions like malaria vaccines which reduce the malaria burden are needed in malaria endemic communities. There is need to establish baseline characteristics in vaccine trial study sites. This study determined the following baseline malariometric indices: spleen rates, bed net use, malaria parasitaemia and malaria episodes in an inception cohort of children aged 12 -60 months in Iganga district, Uganda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mali 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Social Sciences 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,560
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,707
of 263,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#86
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.