You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of detraining after blood flow-restricted low-intensity concentric or eccentric training on muscle size and strength
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12576-014-0345-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomohiro Yasuda, Jeremy P. Loenneke, Robert S. Thiebaud, Takashi Abe |
| Abstract |
We investigated the effects of 6 weeks of detraining on muscle size and strength in young men who had previously participated in 6 weeks (3 days/week) of 30 % of concentric one-repetition maximal (1-RM) dumbbell curl training [one arm: concentric blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise (CON-BFR); the other arm: eccentric BFR exercise (ECC-BFR)]. MRI-measured muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at 10 cm above the elbow joint increased from pre to post (p < 0.01), and the muscle CSA following detraining remained greater than pre (p < 0.01) but was similar to that observed at post. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) increased from pre to post (p < 0.05), and the MVC following detraining remained greater than pre (p < 0.05) but was similar to that observed at post. The ECC-BFR did not produce any changes across time. Increased muscle strength following 6 weeks of CON-BFR was well preserved at 6 weeks of detraining, which may be primarily related to muscle hypertrophy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,638,951
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#76
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,837
of 266,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.