↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of abatacept versus tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with prior TNFi exposure in the US Corrona registry

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of abatacept versus tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with prior TNFi exposure in the US Corrona registry
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13075-016-1179-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie R. Harrold, George W. Reed, Daniel H. Solomon, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Mei Liu, Jeffrey D. Greenberg, Joel M. Kremer

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) vs tocilizumab (TCA) in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) experienced patients. We identified rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from a large observational US cohort (1 January 2010-31 May 2014) who had discontinued at least one TNFi and initiated ABA or TCZ in moderate or high disease activity based on the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and had no prior exposure to the comparator drug. Using propensity score matching (1:1) stratified by prior TNF use (1 TNFi vs ≥2 TNFis), effectiveness at 6 months after initiation was evaluated. Mean change in CDAI over 6 months following initiation was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of achievement of low disease activity/remission (CDAI ≤ 10) and mean change in modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) score. The 264 pairs of propensity score-matched ABA and TCZ initiators were well matched with no substantial differences in the baseline characteristics, defined as standardized differences >0.1 in the stratification. Both treatment groups had similar mean change in CDAI at 6 months (-11.3 in ABA vs -9.9 in TCZ; mean difference -1.27, 95% CI -3.65, 1.11). Similar proportions of both treatment groups achieved low disease activity/remission (adjusted odds ratio for ABA vs TCZ 0.99, 95% CI 0.69, 1.43). Mean change in mHAQ was -0.12 in ABA initiators vs -0.11 in TCZ initiations (mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.09, 0.06). Patients receiving either ABA or TCZ had substantial improvement in clinical disease activity. In this propensity score-matched sample, similar outcomes were observed for both treatment cohorts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 33%