↓ Skip to main content

Using the bootstrap to establish statistical significance for relative validity comparisons among patient-reported outcome measures

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the bootstrap to establish statistical significance for relative validity comparisons among patient-reported outcome measures
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Deng, Jeroan J Allison, Hua Julia Fang, Arlene S Ash, John E Ware

Abstract

Relative validity (RV), a ratio of ANOVA F-statistics, is often used to compare the validity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. We used the bootstrap to establish the statistical significance of the RV and to identify key factors affecting its significance. Based on responses from 453 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to 16 CKD-specific and generic PRO measures, RVs were computed to determine how well each measure discriminated across clinically-defined groups of patients compared to the most discriminating (reference) measure. Statistical significance of RV was quantified by the 95% bootstrap confidence interval. Simulations examined the effects of sample size, denominator F-statistic, correlation between comparator and reference measures, and number of bootstrap replicates. The statistical significance of the RV increased as the magnitude of denominator F-statistic increased or as the correlation between comparator and reference measures increased. A denominator F-statistic of 57 conveyed sufficient power (80%) to detect an RV of 0.6 for two measures correlated at r = 0.7. Larger denominator F-statistics or higher correlations provided greater power. Larger sample size with a fixed denominator F-statistic or more bootstrap replicates (beyond 500) had minimal impact. The bootstrap is valuable for establishing the statistical significance of RV estimates. A reasonably large denominator F-statistic (F > 57) is required for adequate power when using the RV to compare the validity of measures with small or moderate correlations (r < 0.7). Substantially greater power can be achieved when comparing measures of a very high correlation (r > 0.9).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 10 31%
Unknown 5 16%