↓ Skip to main content

Who uses NHS Direct? Investigating the impact of ethnicity on the uptake of telephone based healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Who uses NHS Direct? Investigating the impact of ethnicity on the uptake of telephone based healthcare
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12939-014-0099-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica J Cook, Gurch Randhawa, Shirley Large, Andy Guppy, Angel M Chater, Dong Pang

Abstract

IntroductionNHS Direct, a leading telephone healthcare provider worldwide, provided 24/7 health care advice and information to the public in England and Wales (1998-2014). The fundamental aim of this service was to increase accessibility, however, research has suggested a disparity in the utilisation of this service related to ethnicity. This research presents the first national study to determine how the diverse population in England have engaged with this service.MethodsNHS Direct call data from the combined months of July, 2010 October, 2010, January 2011 and April, 2011 was analysed (N¿=¿1,342, 245) for all 0845 4647 NHS Direct core service calls in England. Expected usage of NHS Direct was determined for each ethnic group of the population by age and gender and compared by actual usage using Chi-square analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine variations of uptake by ethnic group and Index for Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2010 rank.ResultsResults confirmed that all mixed ethnic groups (White and Black Caribbean, White and Black African, White and Asian) had a higher than expected uptake of NHS Direct which held consistent across all age groups. Lower than expected uptake was found for Black (African/Caribbean) and Asian (Bangladeshi/Indian/Chinese) ethnic group which held consistent by age and gender. For the Pakistani ethnic group usage was higher than expected in adults aged 40 years and older although was lower than expected in younger age groups (0¿39).ConclusionFindings support previous research suggesting a variation in usage of NHS Direct influenced by ethnicity, which is evidenced on a national level. Further research is now required to examine the underlying barriers that contribute to the ethnic variation in uptake of this service.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,399,361
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#192
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,681
of 262,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.