You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
How many repeated measures in repeated measures designs? Statistical issues for comparative trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-3-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J Vickers |
| Abstract |
In many randomized and non-randomized comparative trials, researchers measure a continuous endpoint repeatedly in order to decrease intra-patient variability and thus increase statistical power. There has been little guidance in the literature as to selecting the optimal number of repeated measures. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 25% |
| Psychology | 19 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |