↓ Skip to main content

Primary care priorities in addressing health equity: summary of the WONCA 2013 health equity workshop

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary care priorities in addressing health equity: summary of the WONCA 2013 health equity workshop
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12939-014-0104-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Efrat Shadmi, William CW Wong, Karen Kinder, Iona Heath, Michael Kidd

Abstract

BackgroundResearch consistently shows that gaps in health and health care persist, and are even widening. While the strength of a country¿s primary health care system and its primary care attributes significantly improves populations¿ health and reduces inequity (differences in health and health care that are unfair and unjust), many areas, such as inequity reduction through the provision of health promotion and preventive services, are not explicitly addressed by general practice. Substantiating the role of primary care in reducing inequity as well as establishing educational training programs geared towards health inequity reduction and improvement of the health and health care of underserved populations are needed.MethodsThis paper summarizes the work performed at the World WONCA (World Organization of National Colleges and Academies of Family Medicine) 2013 Meetings¿ Health Equity Workshop which aimed to explore how a better understanding of health inequities could enable primary care providers (PCPs) / general practitioners (GPs) to adopt strategies that could improve health outcomes through the delivery of primary health care. It explored the development of a health equity curriculum and opened a discussion on the future and potential impact of health equity training among GPs.ResultsA survey completed by workshop participants on the current and expected levels of primary care participation in various inequity reduction activities showed that promoting access (availability and coverage) to primary care services was the most important priority. Assessment of the gaps between current and preferred priorities showed that to bridge expectations and actual performance, the following should be the focus of governments and health care systems: forming cross-national collaborations; incorporating health equity and cultural competency training in medical education; and, engaging in initiation of advocacy programs that involve major stakeholders in equity promotion policy making as well as promoting research on health equity.ConclusionsThis workshop formed the basis for the establishment of WONCA¿s Health Equity Special Interest Group, set up in early 2014, aiming to bring the essential experience, skills and perspective of interested GPs around the world to address differences in health that are unfair, unjust, unnecessary but avoidable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,204,262
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,425
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,494
of 262,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.