You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging shows evidence of abnormal myocardial laminar orientations and mobility in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0087-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro F Ferreira, Philip J Kilner, Laura-Ann McGill, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin, Andrew D Scott, Siew Y Ho, Karen P McCarthy, Margarita M Haba, Tevfik F Ismail, Peter D Gatehouse, Ranil de Silva, Alexander R Lyon, Sanjay K Prasad, David N Firmin, Dudley J Pennell |
| Abstract |
Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) measures the magnitudes and directions of intramyocardial water diffusion. Assuming the cross-myocyte components to be constrained by the laminar microstructures of myocardium, we hypothesized that cDTI at two cardiac phases might identify any abnormalities of laminar orientation and mobility in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 32% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 46 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,200,399
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#539
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,630
of 271,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.