You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A matter of timing: harm reduction in learned helplessness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-10-41 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sophie Helene Richter, Alexander Sartorius, Peter Gass, Barbara Vollmayr |
Abstract |
Learned helplessness has excellent validity as an animal model for depression, but problems in reproducibility limit its use and the high degree of stress involved in the paradigm raises ethical concerns. We therefore aimed to identify which and how many trials of the learned helplessness paradigm are necessary to distinguish between helpless and non-helpless rats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 27% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 5 | 33% |
Psychology | 3 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,348,322
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#134
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,027
of 262,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.