You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy to traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-439 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angus J M Watson, Hanne Bruhn, Kathleen MacLeod, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Mary Kilonzo, John Norrie, Malcolm A Loudon, Kirsty McCormack, Brian Buckley, Steven Brown, Finlay Curran, David Jayne, Ramesh Rajagopal, Jonathan A Cook |
Abstract |
Current interventions for haemorrhoidal disease include traditional haemorrhoidectomy (TH) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) surgery. However, uncertainty remains as to how they compare from a clinical, quality of life (QoL) and economic perspective. The study is therefore designed to determine whether SH is more effective and more cost-effective, compared with TH. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |