↓ Skip to main content

The effect of adherence to guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy on 1-year outcomes: a French cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of adherence to guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy on 1-year outcomes: a French cohort study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0596-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Cotte, Thomas Bénet, Philippe Vanhems, Corinne Brochier, Thomas Perpoint, Tristan Ferry, Christian Chidiac

Abstract

BackgroundGuidelines for antiretroviral treatment (cART) are published regularly, but there is little information regarding the effect of adherence to guidelines on patient outcomes. We assessed the effect of following the ¿when-to-start¿ and ¿what-to-start¿ guidelines, on treatment modifications, and on immunological and virological outcome at 12 months in a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients initiating cART from 2000 to 2010.MethodsConsecutive HIV-1 infected patients, antiretroviral naive, initiating cART from 2000 to 2010 at a University Hospital were enrolled. HIV-2 infection, cART for prevention of mother-to-child transmission or during primary HIV-infection and unlicensed drugs were excluded. The respect or not of the ¿when-to-start¿ and ¿what-to-start¿ guidelines was based on French guidelines published from 2000 to 2010. Factors associated with cART modifications at 12 months and factors associated with an HIV viral load of <50 copies/mL at 12 months were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling. Variations in CD4 counts from baseline were assessed by univariate and multivariate linear regression.ResultsOf 1365 patients starting cART, 151 were treated outside ¿when-to-start¿ guidelines and 150 were treated outside ¿what-to-start¿ guidelines. Not using ¿when-to-start¿ guidelines was mainly related to early initiation in young men having sex with men, and was not associated with a significantly different outcome at 12 months. Treatments that did not follow ¿what-to-start¿ guidelines were not observed in any specific population and were associated with more treatment modifications and a poorer virological outcome at 12 months.ConclusionsAdherence to ¿what-to-start¿ guidelines is associated with a better outcome at 12 months in HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. Efforts should be made to promote adherence to these guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Social Sciences 7 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,310,081
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,452
of 7,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,326
of 258,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#99
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.