You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do nurses reason ‘adaptively’ in time limited situations: the findings of a descriptive regression analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huiqin Yang, Carl Thompson, Martin Bland |
| Abstract |
Time pressure is common in acute healthcare and significantly influences clinical judgement and decision making. Despite nurses' judgements being studied since the 1960s, the empirical picture of how time pressure impacts on nurses' judgement strategies and outcomes remain undeveloped. This paper aims to assess alterations in nurses' judgement strategies and outcomes under time pressure in a simulated acute care setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,183,066
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#945
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,703
of 256,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.