↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum K13 propeller gene from Bangladesh (2009–2013)

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum K13 propeller gene from Bangladesh (2009–2013)
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abu Naser Mohon, Mohammad Shafiul Alam, Abebe Genetu Bayih, Asongna Folefoc, Dea Shahinas, Rashidul Haque, Dylan R Pillai

Abstract

Bangladesh is a malaria hypo-endemic country sharing borders with India and Myanmar. Artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) remains successful in Bangladesh. An increase of artemisinin-resistant malaria parasites on the Thai-Cambodia and Thai-Myanmar borders is worrisome. K13 propeller gene (PF3D7_1343700 or PF13_0238) mutations have been linked to both in vitro artemisinin resistance and in vivo slow parasite clearance rates. This group undertook to evaluate if mutations seen in Cambodia have emerged in Bangladesh where ACT use is now standard for a decade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 20%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,448,111
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,446
of 5,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,018
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#35
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.