You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Role of respondents’ education as a mediator and moderator in the association between childhood socio-economic status and later health and wellbeing
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1172 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mashhood Ahmed Sheikh, Birgit Abelsen, Jan Abel Olsen |
Abstract |
Most research assessing the effect of childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) on health in adulthood has focused on cause-specific mortality. Low CSES is associated with mortality from coronary heart disease, lung cancer, and respiratory diseases in adulthood. But little evidence is available on the unique effect of different indicators of CSES on subjective measures of health and wellbeing in adulthood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 60% |
Norway | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Unspecified | 11 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 26% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
Unspecified | 11 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,817,581
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,331
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,376
of 365,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#81
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.