You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-12-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie Bryant, Rob Sanson-Fisher, Justin Walsh, Jessica Stewart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,211,074
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#180
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,974
of 369,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.