↓ Skip to main content

Health technology assessments as a mechanism for increased value for money: recommendations to the Global Fund

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health technology assessments as a mechanism for increased value for money: recommendations to the Global Fund
Published in
Globalization and Health, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-9-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yot Teerawattananon, Kate McQueston, Amanda Glassman, Jomkwan Yothasamut, Chaw Yin Myint

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,240,498
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#728
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,589
of 210,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.