↓ Skip to main content

Pearls and pitfalls in comprehensive critical care echocardiography

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
242 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pearls and pitfalls in comprehensive critical care echocardiography
Published in
Critical Care, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1866-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Orde, Michel Slama, Andrew Hilton, Konstantin Yastrebov, Anthony McLean

Abstract

Critical care echocardiography is developing rapidly with an increasing number of specialists now performing comprehensive studies using Doppler and other advanced techniques. However, this imaging can be challenging, interpretation is far from simple in the complex critically ill patient and mistakes can be easy to make. We aim to address clinically relevant areas where potential errors may occur and suggest methods to hopefully improve accuracy of imaging and interpretation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 30 19%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#264,349
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#124
of 6,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,660
of 439,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.