↓ Skip to main content

A study to investigate the effectiveness of SimMan® as an adjunct in teaching preclinical skills to medical students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study to investigate the effectiveness of SimMan® as an adjunct in teaching preclinical skills to medical students
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meenakshi Swamy, Marina Sawdon, Andrew Chaytor, David Cox, Judith Barbaro-Brown, John McLachlan

Abstract

Following the GMC's report on Tomorrow's Doctors, greater emphasis has been placed on training in clinical skills, and the integration of clinical and basic sciences within the curriculum to promote the development of effective doctors. The use of simulation in the learning environment has the potential to support the development of clinical skills in preclinical medical students whilst in a 'safe' environment, but currently there is little evidence on its effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,545,294
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#407
of 3,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,619
of 362,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.