↓ Skip to main content

Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chien-Chi Lo, Patrick S G Chain

Abstract

BackgroundNext generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that parallelize the sequencing process and produce thousands to millions, or even hundreds of millions of sequences in a single sequencing run, have revolutionized genomic and genetic research. Because of the vagaries of any platform¿s sequencing chemistry, the experimental processing, machine failure, and so on, the quality of sequencing reads is never perfect, and often declines as the read is extended. These errors invariably affect downstream analysis/application and should therefore be identified early on to mitigate any unforeseen effects.ResultsHere we present a novel FastQ Quality Control Software (FaQCs) that can rapidly process large volumes of data, and which improves upon previous solutions to monitor the quality and remove poor quality data from sequencing runs. Both the speed of processing and the required memory footprint of storing all required information have been optimized via algorithmic and parallel processing solutions. The trimmed output compared side-by-side with the original data is part of the automated PDF output. We show how this tool can help data analysis by providing a few examples, including an increased percentage of reads recruited to references, improved single nucleotide polymorphism identification as well as de novo sequence assembly metrics.ConclusionFaQCs combines several features of currently available applications into a single, user-friendly process, and includes additional unique capabilities such as filtering the PhiX control sequences, conversion of FASTQ formats, and multi-threading. The original data and trimmed summaries are reported within a variety of graphics and reports, providing a simple way to do data quality control and assurance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 215 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 19%
Computer Science 20 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 60 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,736,351
of 23,734,501 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#366
of 7,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,780
of 366,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,734,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.