You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Manifestations and implications of uncertainty for improving healthcare systems: an analysis of observational and interventional studies grounded in complexity science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0165-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luci K Leykum, Holly J Lanham, Jacqueline A Pugh, Michael Parchman, Ruth A Anderson, Benjamin F Crabtree, Paul A Nutting, William L Miller, Kurt C Stange, Reuben R McDaniel |
| Abstract |
The application of complexity science to understanding healthcare system improvement highlights the need to consider interdependencies within the system. One important aspect of the interdependencies in healthcare delivery systems is how individuals relate to each other. However, results from our observational and interventional studies focusing on relationships to understand and improve outcomes in a variety of healthcare settings have been inconsistent. We sought to better understand and explain these inconsistencies by analyzing our findings across studies and building new theory. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,091,675
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#679
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,293
of 362,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.