You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical learning environment measurement for medical trainees at transitions: relations with socio-cultural factors and mental distress
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-226 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jer-Chia Tsai, Cheng-Sheng Chen, I-Feng Sun, Keh-Min Liu, Chung-Sheng Lai |
Abstract |
Measuring clinical learning environment is crucial for the quality improvement of medical education, especially for medical trainees at transition stages. Medical education in Taiwan is shaped by multiple socio-cultural influences. The aims of this study were to construct an instrument for measuring clinical learning environment in alignment with the local socio-cultural factors and medical training settings, and further investigate the relationship between the quality of the clinical learning environment and the status of mental distress among medical trainees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
Ecuador | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Morocco | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 27 | 32% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,706,225
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#889
of 3,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,200
of 260,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.