↓ Skip to main content

Models of β-amyloid induced Tau-pathology: the long and “folded” road to understand the mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Models of β-amyloid induced Tau-pathology: the long and “folded” road to understand the mechanism
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-9-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilie-Cosmin Stancu, Bruno Vasconcelos, Dick Terwel, Ilse Dewachter

Abstract

The amyloid cascade hypothesis has been the prevailing hypothesis in Alzheimer's Disease research, although the final and most wanted proof i.e. fully successful anti-amyloid clinical trials in patients, is still lacking. This may require a better in depth understanding of the cascade. Particularly, the exact toxic forms of Abeta and Tau, the molecular link between them and their respective contributions to the disease process need to be identified in detail. Although the lack of final proof has raised substantial criticism on the hypothesis per se, accumulating experimental evidence in in vitro models, in vivo models and from biomarkers analysis in patients supports the amyloid cascade and particularly Abeta-induced Tau-pathology, which is the focus of this review. We here discuss available models that recapitulate Abeta-induced Tau-pathology and review some potential underlying mechanisms. The availability and diversity of these models that mimic the amyloid cascade partially or more complete, provide tools to study remaining questions, which are crucial for development of therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's Disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 317 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 20%
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 68 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 15%
Neuroscience 48 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 6%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 76 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,225,595
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#565
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,596
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.