↓ Skip to main content

Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
4 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debora Fumagalli, Alexis Blanchet-Cohen, David Brown, Christine Desmedt, David Gacquer, Stefan Michiels, Françoise Rothé, Samira Majjaj, Roberto Salgado, Denis Larsimont, Michail Ignatiadis, Marion Maetens, Martine Piccart, Vincent Detours, Christos Sotiriou, Benjamin Haibe-Kains

Abstract

Microarrays have revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research by enabling studies of gene expression on a transcriptome-wide scale. Recently, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) has emerged as an alternative for precise readouts of the transcriptome. To date, no study has compared the ability of the two technologies to quantify clinically relevant individual genes and microarray-derived gene expression signatures (GES) in a set of BC samples encompassing the known molecular BC's subtypes. To accomplish this, the RNA from 57 BCs representing the four main molecular subtypes (triple negative, HER2 positive, luminal A, luminal B), was profiled with Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 chips and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The correlations of three clinically relevant BC genes, six molecular subtype classifiers, and a selection of 21 GES were evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Computer Science 13 8%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,702,167
of 23,482,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,381
of 10,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,475
of 365,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#32
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,482,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,780 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.