You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cognitive intervention through a training program for picture book reading in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroyuki Suzuki, Masataka Kuraoka, Masashi Yasunaga, Kumiko Nonaka, Ryota Sakurai, Rumi Takeuchi, Yoh Murayama, Hiromi Ohba, Yoshinori Fujiwara |
Abstract |
Non-pharmacological interventions are expected to be important strategies for reducing the age-adjusted prevalence of senile dementia, considering that complete medical treatment for cognitive decline has not yet been developed. From the viewpoint of long-term continuity of activity, it is necessary to develop various cognitive stimulating programs. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a cognitive intervention through a training program for picture book reading for community-dwelling older adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 9 | 39% |
Chile | 3 | 13% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 156 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 21% |
Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 31 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 9% |
Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,052,059
of 24,151,461 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#472
of 3,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,833
of 370,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,151,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.