↓ Skip to main content

Influence of tourniquet use in primary total knee arthroplasty with drainage: a prospective randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of tourniquet use in primary total knee arthroplasty with drainage: a prospective randomised controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0683-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Zhou, Tingxian Ling, Haoyang Wang, Zongke Zhou, Bin Shen, Jing Yang, Pengde Kang, Fuxing Pei

Abstract

We aimed to compare the effect of tourniquet use or lack of it on recovery following uncomplicated primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a prospective randomised double-blinded study, 150 patients undergoing primary TKA were assigned to either a tourniquet or non-tourniquet group. At the early phase, 3 and 6 months after surgery, an independent observer assessed the primary outcome measure (i.e. total blood loss) and secondary outcome measures (i.e. wound complications, visual analogue scale pain score and knee range of motion). The tourniquet group exhibited reduced intraoperative blood loss (215.7 ± 113.7 ml vs. 138.6 ± 93.9 ml, P < 0.001) and shorter operating time (77.2 ± 14.5 min vs. 82.0 ± 12.7 min, P = 0.038). However, the non-tourniquet group showed less postoperative blood loss (180.2 ± 117.0 ml vs. 253.7 ± 144.2 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (89.2 ± 66.3 ml vs. 164.5 ± 97.8 ml, P = 0.004), less thigh pain (all P < 0.001) in the initial 3 weeks, better knee range of motion (ROM) in the initial 3 days (day 1 81.6 ± 17.1 vs. 75.95 ± 14.55, P = 0.036; day 3 99.8 ± 13.7 vs. 93.95 ± 11.15, P = 0.005) and fewer wound tension vesicles (10.3 vs. 29.2%, P = 0.005). Earlier straight-leg raising (4.6 ± 3.8 h vs. 6.4 ± 4.3 h, P = 0.01) and shorter length of stay (6.3 ± 1.7 days vs. 7.1 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.001) were found in the non-tourniquet group. Similar total blood loss and blood transfusion rate were observed for both groups. All other parameters revealed no significant differences. Our study suggests that a non-tourniquet TKA would lead to early rehabilitation without increasing side effects. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-16007851 , 1/29/2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 39 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 43 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,537,173
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#256
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,484
of 325,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.