You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
GlideScope Use improves intubation success rates: an observational study using propensity score matching
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-101 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James W Ibinson, Catalin S Ezaru, Daniel S Cormican, Michael P Mangione |
Abstract |
Rigid video laryngoscopes are popular alternatives to direct laryngoscopy for intubation, but further large scale prospective studies comparing these devices to direct laryngoscopy in routine anesthesiology practice are needed. We hypothesized that the first pass success rate with one particular video laryngoscope, the GlideScope, would be higher than the success rate with direct laryngoscopy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Italy | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Librarian | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 58% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,630,228
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#70
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,574
of 262,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.