↓ Skip to main content

Age-period-cohort analysis on the cancer mortality in rural China: 1990–2010

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-period-cohort analysis on the cancer mortality in rural China: 1990–2010
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-13-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peigang Wang, Chunling Xu, Chuanhua Yu

Abstract

Cancer has become a global health problem. China still suffers continuous increasing cancer mortality. To study the trend of cancer mortality in rural China, this paper established an Age-Period-Cohort model to discuss the age effect, period effect and cohort effect on cancer mortality in rural China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Other 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Computer Science 3 14%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,721,917
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,371
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,520
of 305,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.