↓ Skip to main content

Sedation assessment in a mobile intensive care unit: a prospective pilot-study on the relation of clinical sedation scales and the bispectral index

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sedation assessment in a mobile intensive care unit: a prospective pilot-study on the relation of clinical sedation scales and the bispectral index
Published in
Critical Care, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0615-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Prottengeier, Andreas Moritz, Sebastian Heinrich, Christine Gall, Joachim Schmidt

Abstract

IntroductionThe critically-ill undergoing inter-hospital transfers commonly receive sedatives in continuation of their therapeutic regime or to facilitate a safe transfer shielded from external stressors. While sedation assessment is well established in critical care in general, there is only little data available relating to the special conditions during patient transport and their effect on patient sedation levels. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility and relationship of clinical sedation assessment (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)) and objective physiological monitoring (bispectral index (BIS)) during patient transfers in our Mobile-ICU.MethodsThe levels of sedation of 30 pharmacologically sedated patients were evaluated at 12 to 17 distinct measurement points spread strategically over the course of a transfer by use of the RASS and BIS. To investigate the relation between the RASS and the BIS, Spearman¿s squared rank correlation coefficient (¿2) and the Kendall¿s rank correlation coefficient (¿) were calculated. The diagnostic value of the BIS with respect to the RASS was investigated by its sensitivity and positive predictive value for possible patient awakening. Therefore, measurements were dichotomized considering a clinically sensible threshold of 80 for BIS-values and classifying RASS values being nonnegative.ResultsSpearman¿s rank correlation resulted to ¿2¿=¿0.431 (confidence interval (CI) =0.341 to 0.513). The Kendall¿s correlation coefficient was calculated as ¿ =0.522 (CI =0.459 to 0.576). Awakening of patients (RASS ¿0) was detected by a BIS value of 80 and above with a sensitivity of 0.97 (CI =0.89 to 1.00) and a positive predictive value of 0.59 (CI =0.45 to 0.71).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the BIS-Monitor can be used for the assessment of sedation levels in the intricate environment of a Mobile-ICU, especially when well-established clinical scores as the RASS are impracticable. The use of BIS is highly sensitive in the detection of unwanted awakening of patients during transfers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Chemistry 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,655
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,103
of 369,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#75
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.