↓ Skip to main content

Men’s knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer screening in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Men’s knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer screening in Kenya
Published in
BMC Women's Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12905-014-0138-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joelle I Rosser, Jennifer M Zakaras, Sabina Hamisi, Megan J Huchko

Abstract

BackgroundA number of studies have identified male involvement as an important factor effecting reproductive health outcomes, particularly in the areas of family planning, antenatal care, and HIV care. As access to cervical cancer screening programs improves in resource-poor settings, particularly through the integration of HIV and cervical cancer services, it is important to understand the role of male partner support in women¿s utilization of screening and treatment.MethodsWe administered an oral survey to 110 men in Western Kenya about their knowledge and attitudes regarding cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Men who had female partners eligible for cervical cancer screening were recruited from government health facilities where screening was offered free of charge.ResultsSpecific knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, prevention, and treatment was low. Only half of the men perceived their partners to be at risk for cervical cancer, and many reported that a positive screen would be emotionally upsetting. Nevertheless, all participants said they would encourage their partners to get screened.ConclusionsFuture interventions should tailor cervical cancer educational opportunities towards men. Further research is needed among both men and couples to better understand barriers to male support for screening and treatment and to determine how to best involve men in cervical cancer prevention efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 280 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 70 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 19%
Social Sciences 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 89 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,834
of 2,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,695
of 367,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.