↓ Skip to main content

The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting – a pilot study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-14-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Owen O’Sullivan, Gabriella Iohom, Brian D O’Donnell, George D Shorten

Abstract

In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. We planned to recruit 20 anesthesiologists who had no experience of performing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Initial standardized training, reflecting current best available practice was provided to all participating trainees. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups; (i) to undertake additional simulation-based training or (ii) no further training. On completion of their assigned training, trainees attempted their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Two experts, blinded to the trainees' group allocation, assessed the performance of trainees using validated tools. This study was discontinued following a planned interim analysis, having recruited 10 trainees. This occurred because it became clear that the functionality of the available simulator was insufficient to meet our training requirements. There were no statistically significant difference in clinical performance, as assessed using the sum of a Global Rating Score and a checklist score, between simulation-based training [mean 32.9 (standard deviation 11.1)] and control trainees [31.5 (4.2)] (p = 0.885). We have described a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a simulator, during its development, by means of a randomized controlled trial. We believe that the learning acquired will be useful if performing future trials on learning efficacy associated with simulation based training in procedural skills. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965314. Registered October 17th 2013.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Psychology 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 40 33%