↓ Skip to main content

Drug resistance genomics of the antimalarial drug artemisinin

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug resistance genomics of the antimalarial drug artemisinin
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0544-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A Winzeler, Micah J Manary

Abstract

Across the globe, over 200 million annual malaria infections result in up to 660,000 deaths, 77% of which occur in children under the age of five years. Although prevention is important, malaria deaths are typically prevented by using antimalarial drugs that eliminate symptoms and clear parasites from the blood. Artemisinins are one of the few remaining compound classes that can be used to cure multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections. Unfortunately, clinical trials from Southeast Asia are showing that artemisinin-based treatments are beginning to lose their effectiveness, adding renewed urgency to the search for the genetic determinants of parasite resistance to this important drug class. We review the genetic and genomic approaches that have led to an improved understanding of artemisinin resistance, including the identification of resistance-conferring mutations in the P. falciparum kelch13 gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Unknown 271 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 17%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 37 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Chemistry 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 45 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,858,478
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,547
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,748
of 369,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.