↓ Skip to main content

Effects of zoledronic acid and the association between its efficacy and γδT cells in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with preoperative hormonal therapy: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of zoledronic acid and the association between its efficacy and γδT cells in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with preoperative hormonal therapy: a study protocol
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12967-014-0310-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eriko Sumi, Tomoharu Sugie, Kenichi Yoshimura, Harue Tada, Takafumi Ikeda, Eiji Suzuki, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Satoshi Teramukai, Akira Shimizu, Masakazu Toi, Nagahiro Minato

Abstract

Although the efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with breast cancer has been suggested, the underlying mechanism has not been fully clarified. Therefore, which patients may benefit from zoledronic acid and the optimal frequency of zoledronic acid administration are unclear. This study evaluates the effects of zoledronic acid on the tumor response in postmenopausal women with breast cancer and explores the relationship between its efficacy and γδ T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Psychology 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,357
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,361
of 365,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#62
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.