↓ Skip to main content

The epidemiology, antifungal use and risk factors of death in elderly patients with candidemia: a multicentre retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The epidemiology, antifungal use and risk factors of death in elderly patients with candidemia: a multicentre retrospective study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0609-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Wang, Naizheng Liu, Mei Yin, Hui Han, Jinfeng Yue, Fan Zhang, Tichao Shan, Haipeng Guo, Dawei Wu

Abstract

BackgroundThe elderly patients affected by candidemia are growing in proportion to inpatients, but available data are limited. We aimed to determine the epidemiology, antifungal management and clinical risk factors of death in the elderly population with candidemia in China.MethodsThis retrospective study included 63 elderly (¿65 years) and 84 younger patients (16¿60 years) at 4 tertiary hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factors of death in elderly patients.ResultsThe distribution of Candida species did not differ between elderly and younger patients (p >0.05). Resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole for non-Candida albicans species in elderly patients was approximately double that in younger patients. Host-related risk factors (e.g., underlying solid tumour, diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure) and hospital-related factors (e.g., prior stay in an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, central vascular and urethral catheters placement) were identified more common in elderly patients. Elderly patients less often received triazoles and were less likely to receive antifungal therapies mostly because elderly or their guardians quit antifungal therapies. APACHE II scores and 30-day mortality were higher for elderly than younger patients (31.7% vs. 16.7%, p =0.032). For elderly patients, antifungal therapy administered before microbiological documentation was the only protective factor for death, whereas absence of antifungal therapies, receipt of mechanical ventilation and APACHE II score ¿20 were independent predictors of death.ConclusionsElderly patients with candidemia had poor prognoses characterized by certain host and hospital-related risk factors and special pathogen resistance features. More awareness of the burden of this disease is required, and the absence of antifungal therapies should be avoided to improve the prognoses of elderly patients with this severe infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Paraguay 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,243,777
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,459
of 7,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,833
of 361,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#164
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.