You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comfort in big numbers: Does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6673-3-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Petróczi, Jason Mazanov, Tamás Nepusz, Susan H Backhouse, Declan P Naughton |
| Abstract |
The 'False Consensus Effect' (FCE), by which people perceive their own actions as relatively common behaviour, might be exploited to gauge whether a person engages in controversial behaviour, such as performance enhancing drug (PED) use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#297
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,686
of 96,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.