↓ Skip to main content

From individual coping strategies to illness codification: the reflection of gender in social science research on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From individual coping strategies to illness codification: the reflection of gender in social science research on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12939-014-0078-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geneviève Nadeau, Katherine Lippel

Abstract

Emerging fields such as environmental health have been challenged, in recent years, to answer the growing methodological calls for a finer integration of sex and gender in health-related research and policy-making.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,367,088
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,309
of 2,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,619
of 250,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.