↓ Skip to main content

TOSCA – first international registry to address knowledge gaps in the natural history and management of tuberous sclerosis complex

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TOSCA – first international registry to address knowledge gaps in the natural history and management of tuberous sclerosis complex
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0182-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C Kingswood, Paolo Bruzzi, Paolo Curatolo, Petrus J de Vries, Carla Fladrowski, Christoph Hertzberg, Anna C Jansen, Sergiusz Jozwiak, Rima Nabbout, Matthias Sauter, Renaud Touraine, Finbar O’Callaghan, Bernard Zonnenberg, Stefania Crippa, Silvia Comis, Guillaume Beaure d’Augères, Elena Belousova, Tom Carter, Vincent Cottin, Maria Dahlin, José Carlos Ferreira, Alfons Macaya, Mirjana Perkovic Benedik, Valentin Sander, Sotirios Youroukos, Ramon Castellana, Bulent Ulker, Martha Feucht

Abstract

BackgroundTuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare, multisystem, genetic disorder with an estimated prevalence between 1/6800 and 1/15000. Although recent years have seen huge progress in understanding the pathophysiology and in the management of TSC, several questions remain unanswered. A disease registry could be an effective tool to gain more insights into TSC and thus help in the development of improved management strategies.Methods TuberOus SClerosis registry to increase disease Awareness (TOSCA) is a multicentre, international disease registry to assess manifestations, interventions, and outcomes in patients with TSC. Patients of any age diagnosed with TSC, having a documented visit for TSC within the preceding 12 months, or newly diagnosed individuals are eligible. Objectives include mapping the course of TSC manifestations and their effects on prognosis, identifying patients with rare symptoms and co-morbidities, recording interventions and their outcomes, contributing to creation of an evidence-base for disease assessment and therapy, informing further research on TSC, and evaluating the quality of life of patients with TSC. The registry includes a `core¿ section and subsections or `petals¿. The `core¿ section is designed to record general information on patients¿ background collected at baseline and updated annually. Subsections will be developed over time to record additional data related to specific disease manifestations and will be updated annually. The registry aimed to enrol approximately 2000 patients from about 250 sites in 31 countries. The initial enrolment period was of 24 months. A follow-up observation period of up to 5 years is planned.ResultsA pre-planned administrative analysis of `core¿ data from the first 100 patients was performed to evaluate the feasibility of the registry. Results showed a high degree of accuracy of the data collection procedure. Annual interim analyses are scheduled. Results of first interim analysis will be presented subsequent to data availability in 2014.ImplicationsThe results of TOSCA will assist in filling the gaps in understanding the natural history of TSC and help in planning better management and surveillance strategies. This large-scale international registry to study TSC could serve as a model to encourage planning of similar registries for other rare diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,950,180
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,284
of 3,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,797
of 366,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#52
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.